![]() |
|
|
Meister Eckhart
If Eckhart lived today, who would he be? Would he The irony of Meister Eckhart’s life was that he was always loyal to the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church as a Dominican teacher and preacher. Perhaps because of his time, his culture, and his church’s fears, Eckhart’s individuality of expression was not seen for what it truly was: a master’s ability to express thoughts and intuitions into the stages of spiritual growth and the very composition of God beyond the limiting cultural expressions of his time. If Eckhart lived today, who would he be? How would he make a living? Would he be at the forefront of international interreligious dialogue? According to Eckhart, “God is ‘No-thing’ – but rather the Being that undergirds all reality – and we must become no-thing to be one with God.” (2) Eckhart’s “no-thing” is similar to the Buddha-nature that pervades all reality but cannot be circumscribed by one name or form. For Eckhart, the path of detachment teaches one how to let go of a thought, definition, or goal and open oneself to the God in all life who is Wisdom. He appeals to Buddhists because of his emphasis on detachment as the way to this experience of the subject as sacred. When we cling to a mental projection, we may become incapable of perceiving reality as it is. The entire focus on detachment in Buddhism witnesses, through watchful meditation, the Buddha-nature, the dharma of the universe (the rightness of the universe’s intrinsic law). The following poem, “This Mind Is Buddha,” well describes the subjective state, appreciating the suchness, the Buddha, in all natural processes: Eckhart’s “God beyond God” describes the reality in one’s deepest soul: “God’s being is my being and God’s being is my primordial being.” (5) When the unconscious is purified – that is, made conscious – we begin to live life clearly through our original, primordial being. We become childlike, innocent, free of the encumbrances of the unconscious ego-projections that often smoke our minds. When the unconscious is cleared, God’s being has room to grow in our minds, souls, and lives. We open to life as we knew it when we were very young children. Evelyn Underhill speaks of Meister Eckhart as a mystic philosopher and considers the rebirth of which Eckhart speaks to be the birth of the Word in the soul:
There is a connection between childhood characteristics and connection to God inwardly. Mystical rebirth later in life means consciously choosing to unify oneself to the sacred within and without. Once you experience this enlightenment of rebirth into deification, Eckhart states:
The words of Meister Eckhart: “Do not think that saintliness comes from occupation; it depends rather on what one is. The kind of work we do does not make us holy, but we may make it holy.” “People ought not to consider so much what they are to do as what they are; let them but be good and their ways and deeds will shine brightly.” “If a person were in such a rapturous state as St. Paul once entered, and he knew of a sick man who wanted a cup of soup, it would be far better to withdraw from the rapture for love’s sake and serve him who is in need.” “Do not cling to the symbols, but get to the inner truth!” “The shell must be cracked apart if what is in it is to come out, for if you want the kernel you must break the shell. And therefore if you want to discover nature’s nakedness you must destroy its symbols, and the farther you get in the nearer you come to its essence. When you come to the One that gathers all things up into itself, there you must stay.” Sincere thanks to Maria Jaoudi 1. From the Foreword to Meister Eckhart: The Essential Sermons, Commentaries, Treatises, and Defencse, translated by Edmund Colledge and Bernard McGinn (New York: Paulist Press, 1981) Theological Summary, p. 24. Sincere thanks to Robert Ellsberg Meister Eckhart: A Modern Translation, trans. Raymond Blakney (New York: Harper & Row, 1941); Meister Eckhart, trans. Edmund Colledge, and Bernard McGinn, Classic of Western Spirituality (New York: Paulist, 1981)
| |